scrum_master fact extraction + verifier gate + schema_version bump
Three bundled changes that round out the KB enrichment pipeline (PR #9 commits B/C/D compressed into one — they all touch the same persist surfaces so splitting them would just add noise): B. scrum_master reviews now route accepted review bodies through fact_extractor (same llm_team extract pipeline as inference) and append to data/_kb/audit_facts.jsonl tagged source:"scrum_review". One KB, two producers — downstream consumers can filter by source when they care about provenance. Skips reviews <120 chars (one-liners / LGTM-type comments with no extractable knowledge). C. Verifier-gated fact persistence. fact_extractor now parses the verifier's free-form prose into per-fact verdicts (CORRECT / INCORRECT / UNVERIFIABLE / UNCHECKED). Facts marked INCORRECT are dropped on write; CORRECT + UNVERIFIABLE + UNCHECKED are kept (dropping UNVERIFIABLE would lose ~90% of real signal — the verifier's prior-knowledge base doesn't know Lakehouse internals, so domain-specific facts read as UNVERIFIABLE by default). verifier_verdicts array is persisted alongside facts so downstream queries can surface high-confidence facts (CORRECT) separately from provisional ones (UNVERIFIABLE). schema_version:2 added to both scrum_reviews.jsonl and audit_facts.jsonl writes. Old (v1) rows remain readable; new rows get the field so the forward-compat reader in kb_query can differentiate. D. scrum_master_reviewed:true flag added to scrum_reviews.jsonl rows on accept. Future kb_query surfacing can filter by this (e.g., "show me PRs where a scrum review exists vs only inference" as governance signal). Also carried into audit_facts.jsonl when the scrum_review source path writes there.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -343,12 +343,50 @@ Respond with markdown. Be specific, not generic. Cite file-region + PRD-chunk-of
|
||||
attempts_made: history.length,
|
||||
tree_split_fired: treeSplitFired,
|
||||
suggestions_preview: accepted.slice(0, 2000),
|
||||
schema_version: 2,
|
||||
scrum_master_reviewed: true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
try {
|
||||
await appendFile(SCRUM_REVIEWS_JSONL, JSON.stringify(row) + "\n");
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
console.error(`[scrum] failed to append scrum_reviews.jsonl: ${(e as Error).message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Route the accepted review through llm_team's fact extractor so
|
||||
// its entities + relationships land in audit_facts.jsonl alongside
|
||||
// inference-side extractions. Same index, two sources. Tagged
|
||||
// source:"scrum_review" + scrum_master_reviewed:true so downstream
|
||||
// queries can filter by provenance. Reviews shorter than 120
|
||||
// chars are skipped — they're usually one-liners ("LGTM") with
|
||||
// no extractable knowledge.
|
||||
if (accepted.length >= 120 && process.env.LH_SCRUM_SKIP_EXTRACT !== "1") {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const { extractFacts } = await import("../../auditor/fact_extractor.ts");
|
||||
const ex = await extractFacts(accepted);
|
||||
if (!ex.error || ex.entities.length + ex.facts.length > 0) {
|
||||
const factRow = {
|
||||
pr_number: 0, // scrum runs outside a PR scope
|
||||
file: rel,
|
||||
head_sha: "", // no SHA scope; scope is the file+timestamp
|
||||
extracted_at: ex.extracted_at,
|
||||
extractor: ex.extractor_model,
|
||||
verifier: ex.verifier_model,
|
||||
llm_team_run_id: ex.llm_team_run_id ?? null,
|
||||
facts: ex.facts,
|
||||
entities: ex.entities,
|
||||
relationships: ex.relationships,
|
||||
verification_preview: ex.verification.slice(0, 400),
|
||||
schema_version: 2,
|
||||
source: "scrum_review",
|
||||
scrum_master_reviewed: true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
const AUDIT_FACTS_JSONL = "/home/profit/lakehouse/data/_kb/audit_facts.jsonl";
|
||||
await appendFile(AUDIT_FACTS_JSONL, JSON.stringify(factRow) + "\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
console.error(`[scrum] fact extraction failed for ${rel}: ${(e as Error).message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return review;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user